1. Objective of the Book
Uncle Bob’s Clean Architecture lays out timeless software design principles and architectural guidelines that help developers build robust, maintainable, and scalable systems — regardless of language or platform.
2. Core Philosophy
The primary goal of architecture is to support system behavior and preserve options. Good architecture:
- Minimizes the cost of change
- Allows decisions to be deferred
- Separates policy from detail
3. Fundamental Concepts
A. Programming Paradigms
Uncle Bob describes three core paradigms:
- Structured Programming – Eliminates goto, favors sequence and structure
- Object-Oriented Programming – Encapsulation, polymorphism, and dynamic dispatch
- Functional Programming – Avoids state and side effects
Each paradigm exists to manage dependencies and complexity.
B. Design Principles (SOLID)
The SOLID principles form the backbone of clean architecture:
- S – SRP (Single Responsibility Principle): Each module/class should have one reason to change.
- O – OCP (Open/Closed Principle): Software should be open for extension but closed for modification.
- L – LSP (Liskov Substitution Principle): Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types.
- I – ISP (Interface Segregation Principle): Avoid fat interfaces; favor many small ones.
- D – DIP (Dependency Inversion Principle): Depend on abstractions, not concretions.
4. Architectural Layers
The Clean Architecture model is layered in concentric circles, representing levels of abstraction and dependency direction.
A. Layers Overview
From innermost to outermost:
- Entities
- Core business rules
- Independent of frameworks and UI
- Use Cases / Interactors
- Application-specific business rules
- Coordinate flow of data between UI and entities
- Interface Adapters
- Controllers, Presenters, Gateways
- Converts data formats between layers
- Frameworks & Drivers
- Web, Database, UI, External APIs
- Least stable and most replaceable
Rule: Dependencies always point inward, toward higher-level policy.
B. Dependency Rule
- No code in an inner circle should depend on code in an outer circle.
- Inner layers should not know anything about outer ones (like frameworks, UI, DB).
5. Boundaries and Independence
Each boundary separates different concerns:
- Business logic is isolated from:
- UI
- Database
- Frameworks
- External services
Benefits:
- Testability: Core logic can be unit-tested without external dependencies.
- Flexibility: Replace the DB, UI, or web framework without touching business rules.
6. Key Practices
- Use interfaces to cross boundaries
- Keep use cases pure: avoid mixing business logic with infrastructure
- Don’t let frameworks dictate structure
- Architect for change, not for tools
7. Myths Addressed
Uncle Bob challenges common misconceptions:
- “You need a database schema first” → No. Start with business rules.
- “Frameworks define architecture” → No. They’re tools, not architecture.
- “Delivery mechanisms are core” → No. They’re replaceable.
8. Screaming Architecture
A system’s architecture should scream what the system does, not what framework it uses.
Bad: A folder structure like controllers, services, repositories.
Good: A structure that reflects business concepts, like invoices, payments, accounts.
9. Testing Strategy
- Entities: Pure unit tests
- Use Cases: Test business flow
- Interfaces: Use mock adapters
- Frameworks: Integration or acceptance tests
The architecture encourages fast, isolated testing.
10. Closing Notes
- Clean Architecture is not a rigid prescription but a guiding philosophy.
- It’s about controlling dependencies, isolating decisions, and delaying commitment to technology choices.
- “Frameworks come and go. Your business rules should not depend on them.”
Final Takeaways
| Key Aspect | Clean Architecture Principle |
|---|---|
| Codebase Structure | Centered around business rules |
| Dependency Flow | Always inward, toward high-level policies |
| Testability | High, due to separation from infrastructure |
| Flexibility | You can swap DBs, UIs, and frameworks with minimal pain |
| Longevity | Architecture should stand the test of time |
Leave a Reply